Contents
Cal Poly Pomona

Faculty: UWC News: Anticipation Guides


From Writing Center News Fall 2005
Anticipation Guides Lead to More Productive Reading
By John Edlund

At the CSU Teacher-Scholar Summer Institute on the Cal Poly San Luis Obispo campus in 2004, Carol Holder and I ran a workshop on “Reading Across the Curriculum.” We opened the workshop by asking faculty what problems students exhibited in doing the reading for their courses. This generated a list of about 20 different problems, but in this article I will address the following six. Faculty complained that students
  • Will not read before class;
  • Skip difficult material;
  • If they don’t see the relevance, they won’t read it;
  • Form an incorrect hypothesis of the meaning and misread;
  • Have a limited range of ability, i.e. can read textbooks, but not other books;
  • Have no background schema to take in learning.

I am a composition and rhetoric specialist, but for the past three years I have been working with reading specialists on a CSU task force to develop a 12th grade reading and writing curriculum. Because of that experience, when I heard faculty complain that students wait until after the discussion to read the material, I realized that students were saying something to us with that behavior. They were indicating that they don’t like to read difficult material cold.

In fact, all six of these problems can be addressed with a bit of pre-reading activity. One of the simplest pre-reading activities is the “anticipation guide.” Generally, an anticipation guide is a brief series of statements that are related to the topic of an article or chapter that students are about to read. The statements are set up in a true/false or agree/disagree format. In designing the guide you should

  • Write statements that focus on the information that you want your students to think about.
  • Write statements that students can react to before reading the text.
  • Make sure that information in the text will support or oppose each statement.
  • Write statements that challenge student beliefs.
  • Write statements that are general rather than specific.

In our workshop we used a short article by Joan Didion about migraines. Before we read it, Carol gave us questions like the following:

  1. True or False: Women are more likely to suffer from migraines than men.
  2. True or False: Today, numerous highly effective drugs are available to treat migraine.

Once students have answered these questions to the best of their ability, they have a strong desire to know if they are right. They also have an idea of what the article is about, and what information might be found there. They read looking for the answers to the questions. (By the way, the first statement is true; the second is false.) Taking a position on statements like these allows students to activate prior knowledge related to the topic of the reading, create a cognitive schema for assimilating the information and the concepts of the reading, and create a purpose for doing the reading.

Of course, other kinds of questions can be used, and there are other effective pre-reading activities. Almost any activity that gives students a bit of a map of the intellectual terrain and gets them engaged with the issues of the text before they begin to read will help. A little work before the reading is assigned will pay off in better discussions afterward.



Go back to News List-->