Survey Title

Years Applied, frequency

Targeted Participants

Type of Instrument, responses, and goals (goals shown in bold below)

Course Outcomes Assessment Surveys – student feedback on a-k plus l & m. 26 outcomes related questions plus 9 demographic questions.

2007 -2010 quarterly

Students taking selected courses.

End of course on-line survey (subjective/indirect)
5 = Very Good,
4 = Good
3 = Satisfactory
2 = Fair
1 = Poor
Goal: Average of 3.00 or higher

Senior Project Presentation Assessments

2006-2010

quarterly

Industry  representatives assess Senior Project Presentations (100% of projects assessed)

Assessment instrument/rubric (objective/direct)
4 = Professional
3 = Proficient
2 = Marginal
1 = Unacceptable
Goal: Average of 3.00 or higher

Senior Project Written Report Assessment

2006-2010

annual

Professor Emeritus assessment of random 20% sample written reports

Assessment instrument/rubric (objective/direct)
4 = Professional
3 = Proficient
2 = Marginal
1 = Unacceptable
Goal: Average of 3.00 or higher

Senior Project Reflective Piece

2006-2010

annual

Professor Emeritus assessment of  three-page reflective piece written after senior project presentation to assess outcomes h, i, j

Embedded assessment. Assessed with rubric (objective/direct)
4 = Professional
3 = Proficient
2 = Marginal
1 = Unacceptable
Goal: Average of 3.00 or higher

Projects Symposium Industry  Feedback Survey

2008-2010

annual

On-line survey of industry attendees to Projects Symposium Day in May.

On-line survey (objective/direct)
5 = Very Effective
4 = Effective
3 = Moderately Effective
2 = Somewhat Effective
1 = Not Very Effective
Goal: 4.00 average or higher

Lower Division Knowledge Exam covering graphics, materials, processes, statistics, and work measurement

2008-2010

annual

Junior year IME students ho have completed lower division pre-requisite courses.

Objective 50 question exam covering 5 lower division knowledge areas (objective/direct)
60%-100% Very Good  Knowledge
50%-60%  Good Knowledge
40%-50% Fair knowledge
30%-40%, Poor knowledge
0%-30% Weak or No Apparent Knowledge
Goal: 50% average or higher in each of five knowledge areas

EGR 402 Ethics Reflective Piece

2006-2010

annual

Faculty assessment of students taking EGR 402

Embedded assessment (objective/direct)
4 = Excellent
3 = Acceptable
2 = Marginal
1 = Unacceptable
Goal: 3.00 average or higher

IME 112 Teamwork Survey

2008-2010

annual

Faculty assessment of student survey results in  IME 112

End of course on-line survey (subjective/indirect)