|
Back
to Colloquium Page |
BACKGROUND
- Dr. William J. Bellows is the Process Leader for Continuous
Improvement at Boeing's Rocketdyne Propulsion & Power business
unit in Canoga Park, CA. where he reports to the vice president
and general manager. He provides expert consulting, facilitation,
and instruction in the implementation of continuous improvement
activities. Dr. Bellows also serves as an adjunct professor of
"Quality Management" at Northwestern University's Kellogg
School of Management. He earned his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees
in Mechanical Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
-
|
The following web summary was extracted
from Dr. Bellow's presentation and is not intended to reflect
his remarks in their entirety. |
INTRODUCTION
Question: What is a football score a function of?
Audience Responses: Field condition, strategy, strength.
Dr. Bellows adds: "Based on the LA Times the
day after the Superbowl game, it looks like it is a function
of John Elway. We tend to see only John Elway instead of the
names of those who blocked for him--enabling the running backs
to be effective and him to complete passes. The same approach
applies to the example of an airplane. Which is the most important
part? According to whom?"
The Point: Everything is part of a system. Concurrent
engineering recognizes this important truth as the starting point.
The goal is to get all parts of the system functioning to improve
the overall system's performance.
WHAT IS CONCURRENT ENGINEERING?
Most people would answer this question by referring to
one or more of the following:
- · Design
for manufacturing
- · Design
for assembly
- · Design
for environment
- · Design
for "X"
-
- The assumption behind "concurrent engineering"
is that design engineers, manufacturing engineers, production,
and field service will "work together" during the design
phase to produce superior designs and improved methods of production.
Concurrent Engineering is also "Downstream Thinking".
Whatever you design, a major consideration is what will the effect
be on those downstream of me...manufacturing, the customer, etc.
Dr. Bellows contends that simply working together is not enough.
Like the LA Times' view of John Elway, "...we often do not
see the bigger system, only little parts." Dr. Bellows gave
a few examples, one of which was the allegory of the "Red
Pen Company" and the "Blue
Pen Company".
- Consider the Story of the
- Red Pen and Blue Pen Companies
The Blue Pen Company produces blue pens. The cap always
snaps on and snaps off with minimal pressure. The cap always
functions perfectly. The Blue Pen Company is characterized by
a work culture in which its people were happy, dedicated and
involved.
The Red Pen Company produces red pens. Owners of red pens
often find the caps falling off or they need a hammer to put
them back on. In the Red Pen Company people held a rigid "US
versus THEM" view that engendered cynicism, apathy and little
motivation.
The difference between the two company's is summed up in
their two differing operational philosophies: Acceptability
Thinking vs. Desirability Thinking. |

Dr. Bellows describes the "Red Pen" and
"Blue Pen" Companies |
So, what are the differences between Acceptability
Thinking and Desirability Thinking?
|
- |
- Red Pen company
- ACCEPTABILITY
PHILOSOPHY
|
- Blue Pen Company
- DESIRABILITY
PHILOSOPHY
|
|
Vocabulary |
OK, fast, cheap, safe,
lean |
Better, faster, cheaper,
safer, leaner |
|
Perspective |
Everything is absolute |
Everything is continuous |
|
Behavior |
Reactive |
Proactive |
|
Focus |
Problems |
Opportunities |
|
Activity |
Fix |
Improve |
|
Requirements |
Meet expectations |
Exceed expectations |
- Next he measured the differences
in the overall management environment of each company.
|
- |
- Red Pen Company
- Environment
|
- Blue Pen Company
- Environment
|
|
Quality |
Slight effort for pen cap
removal |
Smooth (snap-fit) cap removal |
|
Communication |
Difficult |
Smooth |
|
Process |
Manual operations, disorganization |
Automation, clean, organized |
|
Attitude |
Knowledge viewed as "power"
and should be hoarded |
Knowledge is to be shared |
|
Productivity |
Specification focus (limits) |
Focus on target |
|
Value |
Zero defects or 100% acceptability |
100% acceptability and
more (desirability) |
|
People |
Possessive of personal
work time (territorial) |
Spend own time to save
others time
(investment) |
|
Focus |
Activities |
Results |
|
Scale |
Good/Bad Black/White |
Shades of Gray |
- VARIATION, PSYCHOLOGY, AND WORKING
TOGETHER
Dr. Bellows made reference to concepts used in his Understanding
Variation Seminar during this presentation. For companies
dealing with issues of cause and effect relationships, he briefly
explained Dr. Deming's "Theory of Knowledge" and how
a "newer set of eyes acknowledges that management is prediction
and prediction is based on theories."
Dr. Deming's "Theory of Knowledge" is from his
"System of Profound Knowledge" which promotes the the
following as being all important and never ending:
- Appreciation of a System
- Understanding of Psychology
- Knowledge and Appreciation of Variation
- Have a "Theory of Knowledge"
Add to these the concepts from Dr. Taguchi and others:
- The Ability to Differentiate Between Acceptability and
Desirability Thinking
When we no longer operate from a mandatory "must do"
attitude and change to a "want to do" attitude, we
recognize that the way we treat people affects the way theories
are created, the degree to which individuals cooperate, and whether
they will operate from acceptability or desirability--the psychology
of "volunteering". With these new eyes, we can exploit
the understanding of variation and manage it for maximum profit.
It gives companies a sustainable strategic advantage over competitors.
MOVING BEYOND WORKING TOGETHER -
A SUMMARY
|
Concurrent Engineering is more that just sitting together
or working together--it is "thinking together." |
|
Move from a focus on "continuous improvement" to
a focus on "continuous investment". That is, do not
just try to improve your part of the system. More importantly,
invest in whatever part of the system will maximize the organization's
future success--even if it does not bring you fame and glory. |
|
Believe that "sharing knowledge" is more powerful
than the belief that "knowledge is power." |
 |