Skip To Content

Institutional Review Board


28 Feb 14:  The IRB will be rolling out the new electronic version of the protocol submission, review, and approval process in early 2014. It's called eIRB!  @tune/tick@lab is the software vendor. The IRB is still evaluating and implementing the software.  For the first year, there will be parallel processes of the existing MS Word and email communication with the web-based eIRB system.  Please stay 'tuned' for updates.

07 Aug 13:  The IRB approved in July a guideline about over influential and potentially coercive statements used in consent documents. Examples of both inappropriate and appropriate statements are provided. Click on "Hints, help, and examples" under the Introduction to the IRB tab at left and look for "Undue Influence and Coercion in Consenting".

07 Feb 13:  The IRB passed a new guideline at its meeting today. It's called the SAE for Studies of Assessment and Evaluation, which allows for quicker review (exempt!) of those protocols satisfying the criteria.  An examples is:  an investigation of consumer satisfaction with a program. See here (DOCX) for a copy extracted from the CPP IRB's policy and procedures document.

California State Polytechnic University, Pomona (Cal Poly Pomona) is committed to the protection of human subjects in research. To assist with this goal, the University has designated a Human Subjects Committee (also called the Institutional Review Board, or IRB) to review proposals for research involving human subjects. The Committee evaluates the research only in terms of its compliance with ethical standards regarding the treatment of subjects. While individual researchers are ultimately responsible for their practices, the Committee's review is designed to provide objective input as another level of protection for the subjects. In addition, the independent review by the Committee is of benefit to those who could be held accountable for the research practices -- the researchers and the University.

IRB application form, (click at left to access and download), version 19 February 2014

All IRB application forms (also called a protocol) must be submitted electronically to the Office of Research. Please email the completed protocol to the IRB administrator/Compliance associate Bruce W. Kennedy at In order to facilitate application tracking, please change the application file name to include your name and one or two words describing the subject of the application.

Remember to print off the signature page of the protocol application and sign it. Send that to the IRB office in the Office of Research by campus or postal mail. Signatures must be "fresh" not electronic. Approval of the protocol is contingent upon having all signatures (PI and all co-PIs), which indicates an understanding of -- and compliance with -- the protocol contents and IRB policies.

The question most often asked is "how long does the review process take?" It depends upon the type of review (full, expedited, or exempt). Typically, most protocols are reviewed by the expedited method which can take from two to four weeks, provided that the application packet is complete. Use this self check-list to evaluate your application before submitting it for IRB review; doing so is likely to accelerate the process.

When the review has been completed, an approval memo to conduct the research project is issued under signature of the IRB chair.

Human Subjects Training (click at left to access)

This link takes you directly to the CITI web page for coursework on aspects of research with human volunteers. Go to the section on "Continuing Education and Training" above for instructions and details as well as other training opportunities. NOTE: Training for yourself, advisor, and co-investigators is required for approval of your IRB protocol.

Related Links