Peter W. Ross
jjjjjj

Associate Professor
Cal Poly, Pomona
Department of Philosophy
3801 W. Temple Ave.
Pomona, CA 91768

email: pwross@csupomona.edu

Office: Building 1,
   Room 325
Phone: 909.869.3036
Fax: 909.869.4434

Office hours:
M noon-2; W 4-5;
F noon-1
and by appointment

Research Interests: Philosophy of Mind, Metaphysics, Philosophy and Psychology of Perception, Metaethics, and Philosophy of Science
     I focus on issues in the area of philosophy of mind and metaphysics, including the nature of color and perceptual states, the nature of moral judgment, and the problem of free will. My work on color motivates and defends the view called physicalism which holds that colors are physical properties of physical objects. In "Fitting Color into the Physical World" I present and defend a version of physicalism, arguing that it provides the best reconciliation of our ordinary experience of color with color science.
     In "Common Sense about Qualities and Senses," I argue that the best reconciliation of ordinary perceptual experience with science holds that perceptual states have qualitative properties, but that qualitative properties need not be characterized as qualia (and so as necessarily conscious). And in "Qualia and the Senses," I reject the claim, which can be attributed to Grice, that our intuitive distinctions among perceptual modalities require that perceptual states have qualia. Also undercutting an argument for qualia, in "Color Science and Spectrum Inversion: A Reply to Nida-Rumelin" I show that Nida-Rumelin's case for actual cases of spectrum inversion on the basis of actual cases of pseudonormal vision depends on phenomenal internalism, and so can be rejected from the standpoint of phenomenal externalism.
     Concerning the nature of moral judgment ("Explaining Motivated Desires" and "Sensibility Theory and Conservative Complacency", written with Dale Turner) I consider whether moral judgments are certain sorts of desires or hybrids of beliefs and desires often called besires, and find that the dispute between these two views stems from a deep disagreement over antireductionism.
     Regarding the problem of free will ("Empirical Constraints on the Problem of Free Will"), I attempt to clarify the current debate by considering how empirical research can provide constraints for the philosophical debate. I show that the source of the most powerful constraints is psychological research into the accuracy of introspection
.
      Curriculum Vitae

Links to Courses Spring 2008:

Phl 390, Symbolic Logic II
Phl 453, Cognitive Science
    Amy Gimino's Strategies for Meaningful Learning
Phl 483, Philosophy of Science

Other Courses:
Phl 201, Introduction to Philosophy (Winter 2008)
Phl 218, Symbolic Logic I (Winter 2008)
Phl 290, Philosophy Proseminar (Winter 2007)
Phl 450, Philosophy of Mind (Fall 2005)
Phl 460, Metaphysics (Winter 2008)